Italian Magazine publishes alleged text of True Third Secret of Fatima

JULY 10, 2016

 



 

Italian Magazine publishes alleged text of True Third Secret of Fatima

http://www.novusordowatch.org/wire/third-secret-fatima-CV.htm

The July/August 2013 issue of Chiesa Viva [“Living Church”] magazine is dedicated to what it claims is the true Third Secret of Fatima. It features Dr. Franco Adessa’s article “The Third Secret of Fatima: A Testimony.” According to Adessa, the now-deceased Fr. Luigi Villa, who reportedly had a mandate from Pope Pius XII to uncover and expose Freemasonry in the Catholic Church and to defend her from it, knew from Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani (d. 1979) that the text published in the German magazine Neues Europa [“New Europe”] in 1963, though not itself the Third Secret, contained all of the sentences of the real Third Secret*. Before his death in 2012, Fr. Villa allegedly communicated to Dr. Adessa what these sentences from the Neues Europa text were that make up the real Third Secret. Adessa has now compiled them into one text and presents it in the July/August 2013 issue of Chiesa Viva. His article explains also the necessary background and publishes also the text from Neues Europa as it appeared in 1963 in Germany. 

To download the July/August 2013 issue of Chiesa Viva in full color, click the download link below:

DOWNLOAD PDF HERE (CLICK)**

Novus Ordo Watch does not claim or deny that this text is the authentic Third Secret of Fatima. We are withholding all opinion or judgment concerning it and are merely providing this document as information for those who are interested in this topic.

*Third Secret of Fatima Released in “Code” by Cardinal Ottovianni (sic) in 1963

http://beforeitsnews.com/blogging-citizen-journalism/2015/04/third-secret-of-fatima-released-in-code-by-cardinal-ottovianni-in-1963-2504718.html

April 8, 2015

Related information

A Text appears ‘mystically’ in 1994: Is THIS the Real Third Secret of Fatima?

No Friend of Fatima: Unspinning Christopher Ferrara’s Defense of Benedict XVI

“Pope” Francis and Our Lady of Fatima

Book: The Fourth Secret of Fatima by Antonio Socci

Book: The Secret Still Hidden by Christopher Ferrara

Book: The Whole Truth About Fatima, Vol. 3: The Third Secret (1942-60)

 

 

 

Padre Pio and Chiesa Viva

http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/padrepio-chiesaviva.html

Welcome to www.PadrePioandChiesaviva.com! This site has been developed to expose the Truth of what has happened to our beloved Catholic Church in the past 50 years. We have the permission of the Italian magazine, “Chiesa viva,” to publish their works included on this website. The founder and editor of the magazine is Father Luigi Villa.

Father Villa met with Padre Pio over fifty years ago. In a series of meetings with Padre Pio, Father Villa learned of a mission Our Lord desired to entrust him with that would eventually consume his life up until the present day. This mission was to defend the Catholic Church from Her enemies! Enemies that would not only attack from outside, but also enemies that would be so daring as to enter the very bosom of the Church to attempt to destroy Her from within!

This mission is therefore, truly a mission of love for our One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church that Our Lord promised would never be completely demolished as He promised, “the gates of Hell would not prevail against Her.”

For more information email us at: info@padrepioandchiesaviva.com

For more articles from Fr Villa and “Chiesa viva”: http://www.chiesaviva.com/

 

 

The Third Secret of Fatima – A Testimony

**http://www.novusordowatch.org/chiesa-viva-462.pdf

http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Third_Secret_Dossier_en.pdf
– All emphases theirs

By Dr. Franco Adessa, Chiesa Viva magazine issue of July/August 2013

In the autumn of 1996, shortly before presenting my book “UN Massacre Game?,” in Brescia, I asked Fr. Luigi Villa what I should answer if someone asked questions about the “Third Secret” of Fatima, in relation to the presentation of text of the book.

Father Villa, then, showed me the text of “The Secret of Fatima” which was published, in 1963, by the German magazine “Neues Europa” in Stuttgart, and told me, «If you take the text of the “Third Secret” of Fatima, written by Lucia, and added or removed one comma, you would have created a “fake.”

Now, this text, published by “Neues Europa,” is almost three times longer than the original text of the “Third Secret,” and it can definitely be called a “fake.” But a patently “false” text may contain individual sentences that belong to the original text.» At that point, before my eyes, he opened the pages of that document and pointed out, one by one, the sentences that were contained in the original text of the “Third Secret,” written by Lucia.

After a few years, I returned to this topic, asking Father Villa: «How did “Neues Europa” happen to have this text on the “Third Secret” of Fatima?»

Father didn’t answer my question directly, but said, «Card. Ottaviani wrote that diplomatic document. He was later contacted by those of the “Neues Europa” to find out if they could publish the text. Card. Ottaviani replied in the affirmative.»

On May 13, 2000, being in Fatima for the Beatification of the two little shepherds, Francisco and Jacinta Marto, John Paul II announced the imminent publication of the “Third Secret” of Fatima.

On June 26, 2000, the Vatican published a four page text written by Lucia on the “Third Secret” of Fatima, accompanied by a presentation signed by Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone, Secretary of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and an interpretation of the “Secret.” This interpretation included a letter from John Paul II to Sister Lucia, the report of the interview Card. Bertone had with Sister Lucia, the speech given at Fatima by Cardinal Angelo Sodano on

April 27, 2000, and a theological commentary by Card. Ratzinger, Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

Two days later, at a press conference on the Third Secret, Msgr. Bertone made an amazing statement that ended with these words: «… the secret has nothing to do with the apostasy tied to the Council, the Novus Ordo (the Mass) and the Conciliar Popes that has been asserted by the fundamentalists [Traditionalists] for decades. For this fact alone, it was worth the trouble to reveal the Secret.»

The revealed “Third Secret” consisted of the “Vision” of the three shepherds focused on the “Bishop dressed in White, who climbed to the top of the mountain, and knelt at the foot of a big Cross and was killed by a group of soldiers …”

These painful attempts of John Paul II, of Secretary of State, Card. Angelo Sodano and of Card. Tarcisio Bertone to relate the “Third Secret” with the assassination attempt of Pope John Paul II at St. Peter’s, on May 13, 1981 were also endorsed by Card. Ratzinger, who, in an interview on May 19, 2000, to Orazio La Rocca of “La Repubblica,” stated at the end [of the interview]: «The connection between the assassination attempt and the “Third Secret” is evident, it exists in the facts!»

In the face of this manifest fraud, the press exploded: “Il Messaggero,” “La Repubblica,” “La Stampa” … and, on May 17, 2000, “Le Figaro” published the indignation of a certain Elichar Alesne clearly expressing the general feeling:

«One must really be completely in the ignorance of the history of Fatima to believe the version of the “Third Secret” His Holiness, Pope John Paul II gave us on May 13…»

The same John Paul II, however, in Fulda, Germany, in November 1980, spoke differently to those who asked about the “Third Secret” of Fatima. He said: «… as on other occasions, the Church was reborn in blood, it will not be different this time (…).»

 

 


On January 3, 1944, Lucia dos Santos wrote the “Third Secret” of Fatima on a slip of paper and on January 9 she communicated to the Bishop of Leiria that she had obeyed his order. On June 17, 1944, Lucia delivered the “Third Secret” of Fatima document to Mons. Ferreira, Bishop of Gurza.

 

Then, on the contents of the “Third Secret,” the Pope added, «it should be sufficient for all Christians to know this:
when you read that the oceans will flood entire continents, that from one moment to the next millions of people will suddenly perish,” if you know this, it is not truly needed to ask for the publication of this “Secret”»

And where are these words in the document presented by the Vatican, on June 26, 2000?

The words of John Paul II, in Fulda, were recorded by the magazine “Vox Fidei”!

In 2006, there was an outburst with the case of the “Fourth Secret of Fatima,” which culminated with the publication of the book: “The Third Secret of Fatima Published by the Vatican is a Fake, Here’s the Evidence …,” by Laurent Morlier, and the book by Antonio Socci, “The Fourth Secret of Fatima” roused by the statements made by Archbishop Capovilla on the existence of this “Fourth Secret,” i.e. the confirmation of the existence of a small sheet on which Lucy wrote the “Third Secret” of Fatima.

At that time, I asked Father Villa if he could shed some light on this issue, but he just told me that it was only a private revelation and, therefore, it was not matters of Faith.

I did not insist.

In 2009, when I was collaborating in the preparation of the English edition of the book: “Paul VI beatified?” we worked on the texts in Appendix 4 that reported on the Apparitions of Our Lady of Good Success in Quito, of Our Lady of La Salette and Our Lady of Fatima.

The last text to be defined was the one related to the “Third Secret” of Fatima. Then, I took the document published by “Neues Europa,” transcribed the sentences that Father Villa had indicated as the sentences appearing in the original document of Lucia, printed it out and handed it to Father for his approval. A few days later, Father gave back the paper to me, saying: «It’s okay!»

The English edition of the book “Paul VI beatified?” went to press. On the pages 352 and 353, all the sentences that Father Villa had indicated to me as present in the “Third Secret” of Fatima, written by Lucia on a single sheet of paper, were shown.

On May 11, 2010, during the flight to Fatima, Pope Benedict XVI responded to a question about the “Third Secret” of Fatima, blatantly contradicting the official version of the Vatican in 2000 stating that the consecration of Russia had already been done and that the prophecy of the Third Secret had ended with the assassination attempt on John Paul II, in 1981.

The key words of Benedict XVI were: «We would be mistaken to think that Fatima’s prophetic message has been completely realized.»

In addition, he expressed the hope the centenary of the Apparitions of 1917, may hasten the fulfillment of the “prophecy of the triumph of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, for the glory of the Blessed Trinity.” This sentence was a clear indication that the Consecration of Russia to the Immaculate Heart of Mary had not yet been made, as the “triumph of the Immaculate Heart,” the “conversion of Russia” and the “period of peace” had not yet occurred, despite the Vatican statement in 2000 which claimed that the Consecration had already been made by John Paul II on March 25, 1984.

This statement of Benedict XVI confirmed the general belief of the Catholic Traditionalists of the fraud perpetrated on the world by the Vatican, in 2000.

On May 11, 2010, Benedict XVI also spoke of the “need for the passion of the Church which naturally is reflected in the person of the Pope,” and, therefore, he announced sufferings for the Church, specifying that such suffering would have originated not from external enemies, but from within the same Church.

Benedict XVI, with his own words of 2010, brought the issue of the “Third Secret” of Fatima into the limelight, upsetting the previous official position of the Vatican. Why did Benedict XVI make this sudden “U-turn” on the “Third Secret” of Fatima?

In 2011, in the presence of a witness friend, I stood before Father Villa, and speaking slowly, I put this question to him:

«Father, do you remember when, on the document of the magazine “Neues Europa”, you indicated to me the sentences that appear in the “Third Secret” of Fatima? Do you remember that these sentences have already been published in the appendix of the English edition of the book “Paul VI beatified?”»

 

 


Archbishop José Alves Correia da Silva, Bishop of Leiria-Fatima from 1944 to 1957, was assigned to guard the “Third Secret” of Fatima.

In the photograph, the Bishop with Lucia’s envelope containing the paper bearing the “Third Secret” of Fatima, on which he wrote: “This envelope and its contents will be entrusted to His Eminence Cardinal Don Manuel [Cerejeria], Patriarch of Lisbon after my death. Leiria, December 8, 1945, Jose, Bishop of Leiria.”

 

He replied, «Yes, I remember.»

And I asked: «Do you confirm to me that in the text: “The Third Secret of Fatima” published by “Neues Europa” in 1963, the sentences that you showed me are actually contained in the original text of the “Third Secret” of Fatima, written by Lucia?»

Without hesitation and with emphasis, he replied: «Yes, I confirm.»

Shortly before Father Villa died, I went back again to this subject, and asked him: «Father, what would you think if, one day, I made a testimony about what you told me and what we have already published on the contents of the “Third Secret” of Fatima?»

Calmly, he replied: «You can do it, please, do it».

***

 

FACTS ABOUT THE PUBLICATION OF THE ARTICLE “THE SECRET OF FATIMA” BY THE MAGAZINE “NEUES EUROPA”

On October 15, 1963, approximately three years after the date indicated by Lucia dos Santos for the Vatican’s divulgation of the “Third Secret” of Fatima, the German newspaper of Stuttgart, “Neues Europa,” printed the text of “The Secret of Fatima,” written by the journalist Louis Emrich, presented under the title: “The Future of Humanity in the Light of Moscow’s Agreement and the Revelations of the Mother of God at La Salette and at Fatima.”

The text, leaked by a diplomatic indiscretion, would have been sent, for informational purposes only, by the Vatican

Authorities to those in Washington, London and Moscow, considering it essential to an agreement on the cessation of nuclear tests.

The exact same document was published in “The St. Anthony Herald” N. 15 of May 15, 1975, by a group of spiritual sons of the Servant of God, Padre Pio of Pietrelcina.

«In 1963, the German magazine “Neues Europa” revealed what could be part of the contents of the “Third Secret”: “Cardinal against Cardinal and Bishop against Bishop.” We know what Card. Ottaviani – who had read the “Third Secret”- said when asked if the article of “Neues Europa” could be republished. He replied with great emphasis: “Publish 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 copies!”

This statement is even more surprising because it came from Card. Ottaviani, a man with a cold and guarded personality

that was always pretty skeptical about most of the apparitions» (See Father Paul Kramer, “The Devil’s Final Battle,” The Missionary Association, Buffalo, New York – USA, p. 213).

«Marco Tosatti writes: “Father Mastrocola, director of Saint Rita’s Religious Pamphlets, asked permission from Card. Ottaviani to reprint the predictions made by “Neues Europa.” The response was encouraging: “Do it, do it well – said the Cardinal guardian of the “Third Secret”- Print as many copies you like, because Our Lady wanted it to be announced as early as 1960.”

Vatican Radio also spoke on that text in 1977, on the tenth anniversary of Paul VI’s trip to Fatima. The text of “Neues Europa” experienced great success and was even reprinted, on October 15, 1978, in L’Osservatore Romano» (See Father Paul Kramer,” “The Devil’s Final Battle,” The Missionary Association, Buffalo, New York – USA, p. 213, note 18).

In the presentation of the article: “The Secret of Fatima,” published in “Neues Europa,” one reads: «The authenticity of this document has never been denied by the Vatican.»

There was nothing to disprove on the part of the Vatican because it was the same document that disproved itself due to its verbosity; it was too extensive and therefore, necessarily, a fake!

The “code” to that document written by Card. Ottaviani, however, was another one: to recognize the sentences which constitute the “Third Secret” of Fatima in this document!

***

 

 


Bishop João Pereira Venancio, second Bishop of Leiria, gives us his eyewitness testimony that the “Third Secret” is contained on a single sheet of paper with a lot of dimensions and margins. He handed the envelope to Archbishop José da Silva, the Portuguese Nunciature, because it was to be delivered to the Vatican.

 


Father Joaquin Alonso, a graduate in theology and philosophy at the Gregorian University in Rome, a professor of theology in Rome, Madrid and Lisbon, was the official archivist of Fatima for over 16 years, having been appointed by the Bishop of Leiria to prepare a definitive study of Fatima.

 


Card. Alfredo Ottaviani was the author of the diplomatic version of the “Third Secret” of Fatima, which was sent, for information, to the authorities in Washington, London and Moscow, and then published in 1963 by the German magazine in Stuttgart, “Neues Europa,” with the authorization of the same Card. Ottaviani.

 


Fr. Luigi Villa was aware of the “secret” of this diplomatic text of the “Third Secret”: Despite it being a “fake,” it contained all the sentences of the “Third Secret” written by Lucia. He knew all these sentences that, one day, I would point out, one by one, in this diplomatic version written by Card. Ottaviani.

 

 

At this point, it is helpful to remember that in 1956, Father Luigi Villa received directly from Padre Pio the commitment to devote his entire life to defend the Church of Christ from the work of Ecclesiastical Masonry. This appointment was confirmed, then, by a papal mandate from Pope Pius XII. It was for this reason that, for many years, Fr. Luigi Villa played the role of Card. Ottaviani’s “secret agent” as Card. Ottaviani was appointed by Pope Pius XII to train and inform Fr Villa about the secrets of the Church pertaining to his papal mandate.

Among the secrets tasks assigned to him, in that period, there was one [mission] to go to Sister Lucia of Fatima, with a “personal letter” from the Prefect of the Holy Office, Card. Ottaviani, authorizing him to have an interview with the seer.

On March 3, 1973, upon entering the office of the Bishop of Leiria, Fr. Luigi Villa underwent «the usual tactic used by Paul

VI in respect to all those who opposed his progressivism and did not think the way he did about Fatima. (…) The Bishop contacted Archbishop Benelli, Pro-Secretary of State, who went to consult Pope Paul VI. After having received the response, the Bishop of Leiria, turned to me, and told me very harshly that for me there was no possibility of meeting Sister Lucia, let alone talk to her.»

When Card. Ottaviani was made aware of the incident «gasped and said, “This to me! … to the Prefect of the Holy

Office, and without even speaking a word to me! … I will write soon to ‘the top’ [the Pope]! As soon as I’ll have an answer, I’ll call you back and I’ll inform you about it.”» (“Chiesa viva” n. 356, Dec. 2003, p. 14).

Why did Card. Ottaviani, who had already read the “Third Secret” in 1960, send Fr. Luigi Villa to Lucia for a personal interview in 1973? One day, when he was telling me about this “adventure,” Father spoke these words: «Before I left, Card. Ottaviani said to me, “I’m certain, with you, Lucia will speak.”»

Evidently, Card. Ottaviani was not referring to the contents of the “Third Secret” which he already knew, and he wouldn’t even think of collecting “certain information” from Lucia, by sending to her a priest who was not already aware of the contents of the “Third Secret” of Fatima!

***

 

Here is the text published in the magazine “Neues Europa,” on October 15, 1963. Highlighted in red are the sentences that Father Luigi Villa showed me were also the sentences contained in the “Third Secret” of Fatima, written by Lucia dos Santos on one sheet of paper, dated January 3, 1944, seen, touched with his own hands and read by Card. Ottaviani, at noon on May 13, 1960.

 

THE SECRET OF FATIMA

(Published by the German Stuttgard magazine, “Neues Europa” October 15, 1963)

TEXT OF THE SECRET

Don’t worry, dear child. I am the Mother of God speaking to you and begging you to proclaim in My name the following message to the entire world. In doing this, you will meet great hostility.

But be steadfast in the Faith and you will overcome this hostility. Listen, and note well what I say to you: Men must become better. They must implore the remission of the sins which they have committed, and will continue to commit. You ask Me for a miraculous sign so that all may understand the words in which, through you, I address mankind. This miracle which you have just seen was the great miracle of the sun! Everyone has seen it – believers and unbelievers, country and city dwellers, scholars and journalists, laymen and priests. And now, announce this in My name:

A great chastisement will fall on the entire human race; not today as yet, not tomorrow, but in the second half of the Twentieth Century. What I have already made known at La Salette through the children Melanie and Maximin, I repeat today before you. Mankind has not developed as God expected. Mankind has gone astray and has trampled underfoot the gifts which were given it. No longer does order reign anywhere and Satan will reign over the highest places directing the course of events. He (Satan) really will succeed in infiltrating to the top of the Church. He will succeed in sowing confusion in the minds of the great scientists who invent arms, with which half of humanity can be destroyed in a few minutes. If mankind does not refrain from wrongdoing and be converted, I shall be forced to let fall My Son’s arm. If those at the top, in the world and in the Church, do not oppose these ways, it is I who shall do so, and I shall pray God My Father to visit His justice on mankind. Then you will see that God will punish men still more harshly than He did by means of the Flood.

It will come the time of the times and the end of all the ends, if mankind will not convert; and if everything will remain as before, or worse, it would become worse, the great and the powerful will perish together with the small and the weak.

Also for the Church a time of Her greatest trials will come. Cardinals will oppose Cardinals; Bishops will oppose Bishops and Satan will march amid their ranks, and in Rome there will be changes. What is rotten will fall, and what will fall will never rise again.

The Church will be darkened and the world deranged by terror.

Time will come that neither King, nor Emperor, nor Cardinal nor Bishop will wait for Whom Who will come anyway, but to punish in accordance with My Father’s plan.

 

A great war will break out within the second half of the Twentieth Century. Fire and smoke will fall from Heaven, the water of the oceans will become vapors and the foam will rise up flooding and sinking everything. Millions and millions of people will die by the hour and the survivors will envy the dead.

As far as the eye can see, there will be anguish, misery, ruins in every country. You see? The time is continually approaching and the abyss is growing wider without hope. The good will die with the wicked, the big with the small, the Princes of the Church with their faithful and the ruling sovereigns with their people.

Death will reign everywhere for the errors committed by the foolish and by the partisans of Satan, who, then and only then, will reign over the world. At last, those who will survive all of these events will once more proclaim God and His Glory and serve Him like before, when the world was not so corrupted.

Go, My child and proclaim this! I shall always remain by your side to help you.

 

The Third Secret of Fatima

A great chastisement will fall on the entire human race; not today as yet, not tomorrow, but in the second half of the Twentieth Century.

No longer does order reign anywhere and Satan will reign over the highest places directing the course of events. He (Satan) really will succeed in infiltrating to the top of the Church.

Also for the Church a time of Her greatest trials will come. Cardinals will oppose Cardinals; Bishops will oppose Bishops and Satan will march amid their ranks, and in Rome there will be changes. What is rotten will fall, and what will fall will never rise again.

The Church will be darkened and the world deranged by terror.

A great war will break out within the second half of the Twentieth Century. Fire and smoke will fall from Heaven, the water of the oceans will become vapors and the foam will rise up flooding and sinking everything. Millions and millions of people will die by the hour and the survivors will envy the dead.

Death will reign everywhere for the errors committed by the foolish and by the partisans of Satan, who, then and only then, will reign over the world. At last, those who will survive all of these events will once more proclaim God and His Glory and serve Him like before, when the world was not so corrupted.

 

Now, to go back to the size of the sheet of paper, on which Sister Lucy wrote the “Third Secret” of Fatima, here are two quotations from manuscripts of Bishop João Pereira Venancio:

«On March 1, 1957, Bishop João Pereira Venancio delivered the document to the Portuguese Nunciature.

Before leaving the precious document at the Nuncio, Bishop Venancio looked at the mysterious document against a light and discerned a simple piece of paper with some lines of writing. He has identified, in that transparency, the size of the paper and the darker area of the words written by Sister Lucia, but he failed to read the contents, says Fr. Luciano Cristino, Director of the Service of Studies and Dissemination of the Sanctuary of Fatima. Since July, 1982, The Service of Studies (SESDI) has in its archives a handwritten document of Bishop João Pereira Venancio in which he says exactly what he saw in the transparency before leaving the envelope at the Nunciature. (…)

Here is the transcript of the text:

«I delivered the letter to the Nunciature at noon on March 1, 1957. (The larger paper corresponds to the size of the outer envelope, with the date 8 .12.1945 [14.5 x 22 cm].

The second paper corresponds to what was seen in transparency within [12 x 18 cm]. The letter – which could also be seen in the transparency – is of a size a little smaller, at 75 mm from the top and from the right side. On the other sides, it fits inside the inner envelope. The outer envelope, on the back side, had the seal of Msgr. José in red wax. I could not see anything inside the transparency, but one could have guessed that there was wax on the four corners)» (Laurent Morlier, “The Third Secret of Fatima Published by the Vatican is a Fake, Here’s the Evidence …,” Salpan Publisher, 2005, p. 217).

«According to Frere Michel (p. 321) Msgr. Venancio would note as well that the writing on the paper had ¾ of cm margin and Kramer noted that discrepancy with the manuscript of 2000 which had no margins. But the document of Msgr. Venancio which was published recently, says something different. The prelate noted the size of the envelope of Lucia (12 x 18 cm) and notes that “the letter,” also seen in transparency, it is a little smaller than the size, less than 3-4 cm above and to the right, while on the other sides coincided with the inner envelope.» (Aura Miguel, “Totu Tuus” p. 141)

The two quotations may coincide with each other if we could correct two inaccuracies: 75 mm should instead be 7.5 mm, and 3-4 cm should be 3/4 cm. This is confirmed by the two sentences: “the letter” in view of transparency, “is of a size a little smaller …,” and “is a little smaller than the size (envelope Lucia)” … At this point, the size of the letter are finally clear and definitive: the size of Lucia’s envelope least 3/4 cm (or 7.5 mm) above and to the right, while on the other sides coincided with the inner envelope. The letter then has the format: 11.25 cm x 17.25 cm.

 

 

By entering the sentences of the “Third Secret” on a sheet size of 11.25 cm x 17.25 cm written by margins of 7.5 mm, we get the following result:

A great chastisement will fall on the entire human race; not today as yet, not tomorrow, but in the second half of the Twentieth Century.

No longer does order reign anywhere and Satan will reign over the highest places directing the course of events. He (Satan) really will succeed in infiltrating to the top of the Church.

Also for the Church a time of Her greatest trials will come. Cardinals will oppose Cardinals; Bishops will oppose Bishops and Satan will march amid their ranks, and in Rome there will be changes. What is rotten will fall, and what will fall will never rise again.

The Church will be darkened and the world deranged by terror.

A great war will break out within the second half of the Twentieth Century.

Fire and smoke will fall from heaven, the water of the oceans will become vapors and the foam will rise up flooding and sinking everything. Millions and millions of people will die by the hour and the survivors will envy the dead.

Death will reign everywhere for the errors committed by the foolish and by the partisans of Satan, who, then and only then, will reign over the world. At last, those who will survive all of these events will once more proclaim God and His Glory and serve Him like before, when the world was not so corrupted.

 

The above file “The Third Secret of Fatima-A Testimony” is also available in the following languages:

French: Le Troisième Secret de Fatima http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Troisi_me_Secret_Dossier_fr__3_.pdf

Italian: Il Terzo Segreto di Fatima http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Terzo_Segreto_Dossier_it__1_.pdf

Portuguese: O Terceiro Segredo de Fátima http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Terceiro_Segredo_Dossier_pt__1_.pdf

Spanish: El Tercer Secreto de Fátima http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Tercer_Secreto_Dossier_sp__1_.pdf

The Apostolate of Our Lady of Good Success

1288 Summit Ave Suite 107 Oconomowoc, WI. 53066 USA

Phone 262-567-0920

Website: www.ourladyofgoodsuccess.com
e-mail:
ladyofgoodsuccess@sbcglobal.net

 

 

The Third Secret of Fatima

http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/Third_Secret_of_Fatima.html

“In the end, My Immaculate Heart will triumph!” (Our Lady of Fatima, July 13th, 1917)

“The time for all this is coming… Father Villa told me that so many times before dying: ‘Siamo arrivati…'” (“We have arrived…”) –Dr. Franco Adessa on the topic of the Third Secret of Fatima

• Have you ever wondered about that Vatican release of “The Third Secret” on June 26th, 2000?

• Did you ever think there was something missing? A lot missing???

• After all, why would the Church deny the faithful access to the Third Secret since 1960, if it only had to do with the failed assassination attempt on John Paul II?

• So – where can the genuine Third Secret be found?

• And has the Third Secret been fulfilled in the 20th Century?

• What about our 21st Century?

• Or has the Third Secret been unfolding before our very eyes in both of these centuries?

• What did the late Fr. Luigi Villa believe and did he know the Third Secret?

ALL OF THESE QUESTIONS AND MORE ARE ANSWERED IN THIS BOOKLET WRITTEN BY THE LATE FR. LUIGI VILLA’S “AIDE DE CAMP,” DR. FRANCO ADESSA.

Dr. Adessa fought the arduous battle against Freemasonry alongside Fr. Villa for over twenty years. In Dr. Adessa’s testimony, one will find that the Third Secret of Fatima announces the events that began “within the second half of the

Twentieth Century.” There will be those who will want to dispute it by saying that the Twentieth Century is over so how could this secret possibly pertain to us because we are no longer in the 20th Century….? Did the “secret” foretell the date when all would be culminated? … After reading this expose, what will be the logical conclusion?

This booklet not only speaks of our past and our present– it also delves into a formidable future which is very close at hand. But one that will culminate in a triumph!

There are those who may scoff and say that:

“Fatima is finished- It’s over- There is nothing left to tell…” due to the misinformation spewed forth from the Vatican on June 26th, 2000.

But Dr. Adessa poses this question to us all:

Could it be that at this very moment – we are still living out “The Third Secret of Fatima”?

For more information email us at: info@padrepioandchiesaviva.com

For more articles from Fr Villa and “Chiesa viva”: http://www.chiesaviva.com/

 

 

 

THE BACKGROUND

An Italian priest named Fr. Luigi Villa Th.D. (February 3, 1918-November 18, 2012*) of the diocese of Brescia was blessed by St. Padre Pio, by his own Archbishop Msgr. Giambattista Bosio and by Venerable Pope Pius XII who approved the mandate given by Padre Pio to Fr. Villa to dedicate his entire life to defend the Church from the cancer of Freemasonry and to expose other errors in the highest echelons of the Church.

*http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/In_Memoriam_Fr.html

Commencing 1998, Fr. Villa wrote several voluminous books on the errors perceived by him in some of the sixteen Documents of the Second Vatican Council, and on several other critical issues (as we see in the contents of the book Who is Father Luigi Villa? by his longtime associate Dr. Franco Adessa), and brought them to the attention of successive Popes and to each and every Cardinal, Bishop and parish priest in Italy… and he has received no official refutal that I know of to all of the frightening information that he has disclosed.

No condemnation or criticism of Fr. Villa can be located on the Internet either, to the best of my knowledge.

He founded the magazine “Chiesa viva“, Italian for “Living Church”.

One of the Deputy Directors of “Chiesa viva” was the famous German Roman Catholic philosopher Prof. Dietrich von Hildebrand (October 12, 1889 – January 26, 1977), whom Pope Pius XII called “the 20th Century Doctor of the Church” by Pope Pius XII. Pope John Paul II also greatly admired the work of Hildebrand, remarking once to his widow Alice von Hildebrand “Your husband is one of the great ethicists of the twentieth century.”
Pope Benedict XVI also has a particular admiration and regard for Hildebrand, whom he knew as a young priest in Munich. The degree of Pope Benedict’s esteem is expressed in one of his statements about Hildebrand: “When the intellectual history of the Catholic Church in the twentieth century is written, the name of Dietrich von Hildebrand will be most prominent among the figures of our time.”

Dietrich von Hildebrand converted from Judaism to Catholicism in 1914. He authored over two dozen books on issues pertaining to the Catholic Faith. His wife Dr. Alice von Hildebrand, interviewed below, is also a Catholic philosopher and theologian.

Over the decades of his investigation of the possible infiltration of both Freemasons and Communists into the hierarchy of the Church, and certain other evils, several attempts were made to assassinate Fr. Luigi Villa.

In his three books, Fr. Luigi Villa revealed the list of high-ranking Freemasons in the Church and at the Vatican – including the Second Vatican Council — the list including Pope Paul VI, that Pope Paul VI was a homosexual, and the fact that Cardinal Giuseppe Siri was chosen by the conclave following the death of Popes John XXIII and Paul VI in 1963 and 1978 respectively but was forced to withdraw because of threats from the Freemasons, and that Cardinal Luciani who was finally elected and became Pope John Paul I was murdered 33 days later.

“The ’cause of beatification’ continued to proceed until the year 1997. Father Villa was aware of the fact that Cardinal Pietro Palazzini had sent a letter to the Postulator for the ’cause of beatification’ of Paul VI that contained three names of the last homosexual lovers of Paul VI.

When Paul VI … beatified? (Paulo Sesto Beato?)**
was published in 1998, the book was sent to every single Italian bishop. None of them acknowledged receipt; none challenged any of Don Villa’s claims. But the book was eventually instrumental in blocking the ‘beatification cause’ of Paul VI.

**http://padrepioandchiesaviva.com/uploads/Paul_VI.._beatified_english.pdf.

Fr. Luigi Villa’s December 1999 book (which Dr. Alice von Hildebrand inaccurately refers to as published in the year 2000) “Pope Paul VI, a Pope on Trial?” (Paolo VI: process a un Papa?), a continuation of the previous book, “Paul VI beatified?” was the answer to the attempt by the Vatican to continue the “cause of beatification” of Paul VI with the visit of Pope John Paul II to Brescia, in 1998.

On January 31, 2003, the 380-page third book of Father Villa: “The ‘New Church’ of Paul VI” was published, and as always sent to the top of the Church and to part of the Italian clergy. The book was devastating and the reaction was … a deadly silence!

 

It all began when Fr. Luigi Villa was asked by St. Padre Pio to dedicate his entire life to defend the Church from the work of Freemasonry. The Bishop of Chieti, the then superior of Fr. Luigi Villa, Msgr. Giambattista Bosio, was told by the Papal Secretary of State, Cardinal Domenico Tardini that Pope Pius XII had approved the mandate given by Padre Pio to Fr. Villa, but with two conditions: Father Luigi had to have a degree in dogmatic theology, and that he had to be placed under the direction of Card. Alfredo Ottaviani, Prefect of the Holy Office, Card. Pietro Parente, and Card. Pietro Palazzini.

 

“In the second half of 1963, Father Villa had his second meeting with Padre Pio. As soon as he saw him, Padre Pio said: «I have been waiting for you for a long time!» …Padre Pio embraced Father Villa and said: «Courage, courage, courage! for the Church is already invaded by Freemasonry,» adding: «Freemasonry has already reached the Pope’s slippers.» (Paul VI!)”

 

 

In December, 2008, Father Villa received his first award which was the “International Inars Ciociaria Journalist Award,” «… for his very extensive work as a journalist, author of books and pamphlets on theology, asceticism, non-fiction … and for his commitment to defend the Christian roots of Europe and for his protection of truth against forces alien to our civilization.»

In October, 2009, he was awarded the “Cultural Prize of Val Vibrata di Teramo” for being «a journalist, an outstanding writer, an incorruptible editor, Head Publisher and Editor of “Chiesa viva”,» but also «for being an eminent theologian devoting his ‘entire life to defend the Catholic religion and disseminating the historical truth and living according to the Gospel!»

 

The credibility of Fr. Luigi Villa is unassailable.

He also proved that there were prelates and organizations who were actively involved in promoting the “Universal Religion” of the New Age Movement to destroy the Catholic Church (see pages 17 and 29 of WHO IS FR LUIGI VILLA?-DR FRANCO ADESSA).

Read on…

 

 

All words and sentences in green, black, blue and red colour emphases are mine –Michael

Excerpts from my CRITICIZING VATICAN COUNCIL II-IS IT HERESY?

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/CRITICIZING_VATICAN_COUNCIL_II-IS_IT_HERESY.doc

“After Vatican II, a tornado seemed to have hit the Church” -Dr. Alice von Hildebrand

Present at the Demolition – An interview with Dr. Alice von Hildebrand

http://www.latinmassmagazine.com/articles/articles_2001_su_hildebran.html
EXTRACT Bold emphases mine

The Latin Mass magazine, Summer 2001

The following conversation with Dr. Alice von Hildebrand opens our discussion of this issue’s focus: The Crisis in the Church: Scenarios for a Solution.

Dr. von Hildebrand, professor of philosophy emeritus of Hunter College (City University of New York), has just completed The Soul of a Lion, a biography of her husband, Dietrich
(called “a twentieth-century Doctor of the Church by Pope Pius XII”).

 

AVH: […] There have been two books* published in Italy in recent years that confirm what my husband had been suspecting for some time; namely, that there has been a systematic infiltration of the Church by diabolical enemies for much of this century. My husband was a very sanguine man and optimistic by nature. During the last ten years of his life, however, I witnessed him many times in moments of great sorrow, and frequently repeating, “They have desecrated the Holy Bride of Christ.” He was referring to the “abomination of desolation” of which the prophet Daniel speaks.

TLM: This is a critical admission, Dr. von Hildebrand. Your husband had been called a twentieth-century Doctor of the Church by Pope Pius XII. If he felt so strongly, didn’t he have access to the Vatican to tell Pope Paul VI of his fears?

AVH: But he did! I shall never forget the private audience we had with Paul VI just before the end of the Council. It was on June 21, 1965. As soon as my husband started pleading with him to condemn the heresies that were rampant, the Pope interrupted him with the words, “Lo scriva, lo scriva.” (“Write it down.”) A few moments later, for the second time, my husband drew the gravity of the situation to the Pope’s attention. Same answer. His Holiness received us standing. It was clear that the Pope was feeling very uncomfortable. The audience lasted only a few minutes. Paul VI immediately gave a sign to his secretary, Fr. Capovilla, to bring us rosaries and medals. We then went back to Florence where my husband wrote a long document (unpublished today) that was delivered to Paul VI just the day before the last session of the Council. It was September of 1965. After reading my husband’s document, he said to my husband’s nephew, Dieter Sattler, who had become the German ambassador to the Holy See, that he had read the document carefully, but that “it was a bit harsh.” The reason was obvious: my husband had humbly requested a clear condemnation of heretical statements.

TLM: You realize, of course, Doctor, that as soon as you mention this idea of infiltration, there will be those who roll their eyes in exasperation and remark, “Not another conspiracy theory!”

AVH: I can only tell you what I know. It is a matter of public record, for instance, that Bella Dodd, the ex-Communist who reconverted to the Church, openly spoke of the Communist Party’s deliberate infiltration of agents into the seminaries. She told my husband and me that when she was an active party member, she had dealt with no fewer than four cardinals within the Vatican “who were working for us.”

Many a time I have heard Americans say that Europeans “smell conspiracy wherever they go.” But from the beginning, the Evil One has “conspired” against the Church – and has always aimed in particular at destroying the Mass and sapping belief in the Real Presence of Christ in the Eucharist. That some people are tempted to blow this undeniable fact out of proportion is no reason for denying its reality. On the other hand, I, European born, am tempted to say that many Americans are naïve; living in a country that has been blessed by peace, and knowing little about history, they are more likely than Europeans (whose history is a tumultuous one) to fall prey to illusions. Rousseau has had an enormous influence in the United States. When Christ said to His apostles at the Last Supper that “one of you will betray Me,” the apostles were stunned. Judas had played his hand so artfully that no one suspected him, for a cunning conspirator knows how to cover his tracks with a show of orthodoxy.

 

TLM: Do the two books by the Italian priest you mentioned before the interview contain documentation that would provide evidence of this infiltration?

AVH:
*The two books I mentioned were published in 1998* and 2000** by an Italian priest, Don Luigi Villa of the diocese of Brescia, who at the request of Padre Pio has devoted many years of his life to the investigation of the possible infiltration of both Freemasons and Communists into the Church.

My husband and I met Don Villa in the sixties. He claims that he does not make any statement that he cannot substantiate. When *Paulo Sesto Beato?
Paul VI … beatified? (1998) was published the book was sent to every single Italian bishop. None of them acknowledged receipt; none challenged any of Don Villa’s claims. The interview continues further below.

*(http://www.sheddinglight.info/archives_paul_vi.beatified.pdf
not opening)

 

[“The Pope, Cardinals, Bishops and thousands of Italian Priests were given a copy of this book simultaneously. The diocese of Brescia was in turmoil. The Bishop, Msgr. Bruno Foresti, promised the diocesan clergy that a book to refute that of Father Villa would be written. After more than twelve years, those promises and commitments haven’t even appeared on the horizon! The result of the book was clear to everyone: it had blocked the ‘beatification cause’ of Paul VI. No one was able to refute the volume…”

Source:
http://www.chiesaviva.com/donluigivilla%20ing.pdf]

 

The interview continued:

In this book, he relates something that no ecclesiastical authority has refuted or asked to be retracted – even though he names particular personalities in regard to the incident. It pertains to the rift between Pope Pius XII and the then Bishop Montini (the future Paul VI) who was his Undersecretary of State. Pius XII, conscious of the threat of Communism, which in the aftermath of World War II was dominating nearly half of Europe, had prohibited the Vatican staff from dealing with Moscow. To his dismay, he was informed one day through the Bishop of Uppsala (Sweden) that his strict order had been contravened. The Pope resisted giving credence to this rumor until he was given incontrovertible evidence that Montini had been corresponding with various Soviet agencies. Meanwhile, Pope Pius XII (as had Pius XI) had been sending priests clandestinely into Russia to give comfort to Catholics behind the Iron Curtain. Every one of them had been systematically arrested, tortured, and either executed or sent to the gulag. Eventually a Vatican mole was discovered: Alighiero Tondi, S.J., who was a close advisor to Montini. Tondi was an agent working for Stalin whose mission was to keep Moscow informed about initiatives such as the sending of priests into the Soviet Union.

Add to this Pope Paul’s treatment of Cardinal Mindszenty. Against his will, Mindszenty was ordered by the Vatican to leave Budapest. As most everyone knows, he had escaped the Communists and sought refuge in the American embassy compound. The Pope had given him his solemn promise that he would remain primate of Hungary as long as he lived. When the Cardinal (who had been tortured by the Communists) arrived in Rome, Paul VI embraced him warmly, but then sent him into exile in Vienna. Shortly afterwards, this holy prelate was informed that he had been demoted, and had been replaced by someone more acceptable to the Hungarian Communist government. More puzzling, and tragically sad, is the fact that when Mindszenty died, no Church representative was present at his burial.

Another of Don Villa’s illustrations of infiltration is one related to him by Cardinal Gagnon. Paul VI had asked Gagnon to head an investigation concerning the infiltration of the Church by powerful enemies. Cardinal Gagnon (at that time an Archbishop) accepted this unpleasant task, and compiled a long dossier, rich in worrisome facts. When the work was completed, he requested an audience with Pope Paul in order to deliver personally the manuscript to the Pontiff. This request for a meeting was denied. The Pope sent word that the document should be placed in the offices of the Congregation for the Clergy, specifically in a safe with a double lock. This was done, but the very next day the safe deposit box was broken and the manuscript mysteriously disappeared. The usual policy of the Vatican is to make sure that news of such incidents never sees the light of day. Nevertheless, this theft was reported even in L’Osservatore Romano (perhaps under pressure because it had been reported in the secular press). Cardinal Gagnon, of course, had a copy, and once again asked the Pope for a private audience. Once again his request was denied. He then decided to leave Rome and return to his homeland in Canada. Later, he was called back to Rome by Pope John Paul II and made a cardinal. Continued below.

**Fr. Luigi Villa’s December 1999 book (which Dr. Alice von Hildebrand refers to as published in the year 2000) “Pope Paul VI, a Pope on Trial?” (Paolo VI: process a un Papa?), a continuation of the previous book, “Paul VI beatified?” was the answer to the attempt by the Vatican to continue the “cause of beatification” of Paul VI with the visit of Pope John Paul II in Brescia, in 1998.

Source (partly paraphrased): http://www.chiesaviva.com/donluigivilla%20ing.pdf

 

Mumbai’s Association of Concerned Catholics’ MumbaiLaity blog, on November 21, 2012

https://mumbailaity.wordpress.com/2012/11/21/letter-written-by-fr-luigi-villa-to-all-cardinals-regarding-pope-paul-vi-and-who-was-appointed-to-uncover-freemasonry/
published (i) Fr. Luigi Villa’s open — and very detailed and fully documented — 13-page letter sac. Luigi Villa PAUL VI beatified? – Chiesa viva, (
https://mumbailaity.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/letter-to-cardinals-compl-en-11.pdf) to the Cardinals of the Catholic Church questioning the Beatification of Pope Paul VI on a number of serious charges, as well as (ii) the link http://www.chiesaviva.com/paoloVI%20beatoin.pdf to Fr. Villa’s 327-page 1998 book “that stopped the beatification process of Paul VI”. MumbaiLaity also provided a supplementary link http://www.huttongibson.com/PDFs/Paul-VI-Beatified-Book.pdf
to the issue.

 

 

The interview continued:

TLM: Why did Don Villa write these works singling out Paul VI for criticism?

AVH: Don Villa reluctantly decided to publish the books to which I have alluded. But when several bishops pushed for the beatification of Paul VI, this priest perceived it as a clarion call to print the information he had gathered through the years. In so doing, he was following the guidelines of a Roman Congregation, informing the faithful that it was their duty as members of the Church to relay to the Congregation any information that might militate against the candidate’s qualifications for beatification.

Considering the tumultuous pontificate of Paul VI, and the confusing signals he was giving, e.g.: speaking about the “smoke of Satan that had entered the Church,” yet refusing to condemn heresies officially; his promulgation of Humanae Vitae (the glory of his pontificate), yet his careful avoidance of proclaiming it ex cathedra; delivering his Credo of the People of God in Piazza San Pietro in 1968, and once again failing to declare it binding on all Catholics; disobeying the strict orders of Pius XII to have no contact with Moscow, and appeasing the Hungarian Communist government by reneging on the solemn promise he had made to Cardinal Mindszenty; his treatment of holy Cardinal Slipyj, who had spent seventeen years in a Gulag, only to be made a virtual prisoner in the Vatican by Paul VI; and finally asking Archbishop Gagnon to investigate possible infiltration in the Vatican, only to refuse him an audience when his work was completed – all these speak strongly against the beatification of Paolo VI, dubbed in Rome, “Paolo Sesto, Mesto” (Paul VI, the sad one).

That the duty to publish this depressing information was onerous and cost Don Villa great sorrow cannot be doubted. Any Catholic rejoices when he can look up to a Pope with boundless veneration. But Catholics also know that even though Christ never promised He would give us perfect leaders, He did promise that the gates of hell shall not prevail. Let us not forget that even though the Church has had some very bad popes, and some mediocre ones, she has been blessed with many great popes. Eighty of them have been canonized and several have been beatified. This is a success story that does not bear parallel in the secular world.

God alone is the judge of Paul VI. But it cannot be denied that his pontificate was a very complex and tragic one. It was under him that, in the course of fifteen years, more changes were introduced in the Church than in all preceding centuries combined. What is worrisome is that when we read the testimony of ex-Communists like Bella Dodd, and study Freemasonic documents (dating from the nineteenth century, and usually penned by fallen-away priests like Paul Roca), we can see that, to a large extent, their agenda has been carried out: the exodus of priests and nuns after Vatican II, dissenting theologians not censured, feminism, the pressure put on Rome to abolish priestly celibacy, immorality in the clergy, blasphemous liturgies (see the article by David Hart in First Things, April 2001, “The Future of the Papacy”), the radical changes that have been introduced into the sacred liturgy (see Cardinal Ratzinger’s book Milestones, pp. 126 and 148, Ignatius Press), and a misleading ecumenism. Only a blind person could deny that many of the Enemy’s plans have been perfectly carried out.

One should not forget that the world was shocked at what Hitler did. People like my husband, however, actually read what he had said in Mein Kampf. The plan was there. The world simply chose not to believe it.

But grave as the situation is, no committed Catholic can forget that Christ has promised that He will remain with His Church to the very end of the world. We should meditate on the scene related in the Gospel when the apostles’ boat was battered by a fierce storm. Christ was sleeping! His terrified followers woke Him up: He said one word, and there was a great calm. “O ye of little faith!” The end of the interview

 

 

More excerpts from my CRITICIZING VATICAN COUNCIL II-IS IT HERESY?

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/CRITICIZING_VATICAN_COUNCIL_II-IS_IT_HERESY.doc

Vatican II About Face [EXTRACTS]

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/11813503/vatican-ii-about-face-chiesa-viva/9

http://chiesaviva.com/vaticano%20II%20dietro%20front%20ing.pdf

By
Fr. Luigi Villa, Th. D.,
208 pages, 2011

Preface

Despite all the post-Conciliar authoritarian voices’ attempts to silence any criticism, my articles portraying a critical analysis of the Second Vatican Council have created a certain amount of interest for they have discovered and pointed out multiple “errors” in the Council’s texts (Constitutions, Decrees and Declarations).

Up until now, only a certain number of Catholic critics had been outspoken about the fallacious arguments, contradictions, unforeseen resolutions and mysterious decisions of the post-Conciliar documents. However, no one had pointed fingers against the Council itself through a systematic study, setting up a direct comparison of their texts with the texts of the dogmatic teaching of Tradition (the Magisterium) throughout the twenty centuries of infallible ecumenical councils and teachings of all previous Popes.

It is clear that this study involves the question of the “theological status” to be attributed to Vatican II, that is, whether or not is covered by the charism of infallibility.

The best theologians have excluded [this charism] because it [the Council’s texts] contained so many grave “errors” already condemned by the solemn Magisterium of the Church.

Vatican II texts lack dogmatic definitions and the corresponding punishment for those who do not accept the doctrine.

But then Vatican II had defined nothing; therefore no one can appeal to them for several reasons.

 

For example: the “Constitution on the Liturgy” deliberately ignored Pius XII’s doctrine of “Mediator Dei”, as well as St. Pius X’s Encyclical which condemned Modernism; in addition, the statement on “religious freedom” in Pius IX’s “Syllabus” was ignored, in which he condemned, in No. 15, the argument of those who say that every man is free to embrace that religion which, in conscience, seems real, which excludes the rights of the revealing God, of which no man has a right to choose, but only to obey. No. 14 also condemns those who assert that the Church has no right to exercise judicial and coercive power.

These are just a few examples, like those found throughout our work, to prove that Vatican II was held on the verge of ruin.

I believe that there will come a day when Vatican II will be declared “null and void” in a solemn judgement of the Supreme Pontiff. It will then appear as an anomalous stone, abandoned at the back of a cemetery. (Pages 9 and 10 of 208)

 

Introduction

The Second Vatican Council was one of the longest in history, from beginning to end.

It lasted five years, ten months and twenty-four days. It was one of the most difficult Councils: 168 General Congregations, over 60o0 written and oral statements, 10 public sessions, 11 Commissions and Secretaries, and hundreds of experts.

The results of it were four Constitutions, nine Decrees, and three Declarations.

For this reason, it has been compared to plowing a field. At the end of Vatican II, the Church opened to a trend f giving in to worldliness, the results of which were the desacralization, democratization, socialization and banalization of the Church, described by Cardinal Ottaviani as “an enormous deviation from the Catholic doctrine”.

How was it possible that three Popes had accepted a doctrine in clear contradiction with what 260 Pontiffs had supported? Monsignor Spadafora*, the brilliant professor from the Lateran University and an “expert” in the Sacred Scriptures, has stated that, “The Second Vatican Council is an abnormal Council.”

The unexpected reversal of the Catholic doctrinal guidelines, brought about by an Alliance of French and Belgian Cardinals and bishops, encouraged by experts like Rahner, Küng, De Lubac, Chenu, Congàr, and by Jesuits from the Pontifical Bible Institute, has converted Vatican II into an ominous “consultation” of Councils of Neo-Modernist “experts” who have duped the oblivious multitudes of Council Fathers. However, how did they manage to impact the Church’s doctrine? There has been no revealed truth left intact. From the beginning of the two Constitutions presented as the fundamental expression of the Council, “Lumen Gentium” and “Gaudium et Spes” contained errors, such as the expression by which the Mystical Body of Jesus Christ “subsists” in the Catholic Church, which contradicts the identity expressed by Saint Paul, that is, on the Body of Christ, and the perennial and infallible Magisterium of the Church, and also contradicts the dogma “there is no salvation out of the Church.” Not to mention clearly erroneous Documents such as “Nostra Aetate” (about non-Christian religions) and “Dignitatis Humanae” (about religious freedom); these errors are the origin of heretical and syncretistic manifestations such as the ecumenical day of Assisi… (Pages 13 and 14 of 208)

 

Theological qualification of the Second Vatican Council

We have already said that the Second Vatican Council, in its “Decrees”, did not have the charism of infallibility because it did not want to effectively use dogmatic definitions, that is, use the definition and reinforce them with the sanctions of anathemas against those who were contrary to the defined doctrines.

Therefore, none of the doctrines or Decrees from Vatican II have the charism of infallibility because the Council was limited to expressing Catholic doctrine in “pastoral form”. We know this from the words of Pope John XXIII and Pope Paul VI in the two opening speeches of Vatican II (October 11, 1962 and September 29, 1963)…

Vatican II was not a dogmatic Council and because of that it is inexplicable how it can be possible that the four Constitutions were named “Dogmatic”, for neither these nor other documents from the Council were defined by new dogmas, just like errors were not condemned. (Pages 35 and 36 of 208)

 

Chapter VI

At this time, fifty years have passed since the closing of Vatican II, and we can see its “fruits.” The Council, which wanted a “Reform” for the betterment of the Church, instead, opened the doors to all the “errors” of modern society, that had already been denounced by the centuries-old Magisterium of the Popes, thereby undermining the doctrine and the structure of the Church itself. Vatican II, in fact, promoted doctrines in open contradiction with the Catholic faith. These doctrinal deviations are contained in Constitutions, Decrees, Declarations. Vatican II, therefore, taught and applied the “errors” and “heresies” that the Church had previously banned. (Page 152 of 208)

 

 

Still more excerpts from my CRITICIZING VATICAN COUNCIL II-IS IT HERESY?

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/CRITICIZING_VATICAN_COUNCIL_II-IS_IT_HERESY.doc

The Testimony of others

*2. Monsignor Francesco Spadafora, an expert in the Sacred Scriptures, has stated that, “The Second Vatican Council is an abnormal Council.” (http://chiesaviva.com/vaticano%20II%20dietro%20front%20ing.pdf
page 13)

Having heard that, let us again listen to Dr. Fr. Luigi Villa:

After the Council, the faith of the faithful was so shaken that Cardinal Ottaviani asked all the Bishops of the world and the Superior Generals of the Orders and the Congregations, to respond to the inquiry on the danger for the “fundamental truths” of our Faith.

 

The Popes, before Vatican II, had always called to order and even made condemnations. Catholic liberalism was condemned by Pius IX; Modernism by Leo XIII; Syllogism by St. Pius X; Communism by Pius XI; Neo-Modernism by Pius XII. Thanks to this episcopal vigilance, the Church became strengthened and developed. There were numerous conversions by pagans and Protestants; heresy was in retreat and countries had sanctioned a more Catholic legislation.

Following Vatican II this position taken by the Church was rejected which became a tragedy never before experienced by the Church. The Council permitted people to doubt the truth. The consequences, therefore, were ever more serious. The doubts on the necessity of the Church and the Sacraments caused priestly vocations to disappear. The doubts on the necessity and nature of “conversion” were the ruin of the traditional spirituality in the Novitiates with the disappearance of religious vocations. It injected futility into the missions. The doubts on the legitimacy of authority and obedience, on the reasons for autonomy of conscience, of freedom, shook up all the social factions: the Church, religious societies, dioceses and civil societies, and especially the family.

The doubts on the necessity of Grace in order to be saved led to the lack of respect for Baptism, and the abandonment of the sacrament of Penance. The doubts on the necessity of the Church as the only source of salvation destroyed the authority of the Magisterium of the Church, as no longer “Magistra Veritatis”! [“The Teacher of Truth”!]

(Excerpt from Vatican II About Face, 2011, http://chiesaviva.com/vaticano%20II%20dietro%20front%20ing.pdf page 194)

 

Who can challenge the veracity of the observations and conclusions of Fr. Luigi Villa?

 

We have seen dissent as well as the criticism and even condemnation of some of the texts of the Council documents at every level among the eminent prelates of the Church who were present at all the four sessions of Vatican Council II. (I can present a whole lot more of this.)

It may be observed that the statements of the Cardinals endorse the criticisms of the Council documents by Fr. Luigi Villa, especially on the Conciliar document Dignitatis Humanae.

Would one label any or all of them heretics for their criticisms of the Second Vatican Council? END

 

 

Excerpts from NOVUS ORDO MASS A MOST TRAGIC ALTERNATIVE-CARDINAL OTTAVIANI

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NOVUS_ORDO_MASS_A_MOST_TRAGIC_ALTERNATIVE-CARDINAL_OTTAVIANI.doc

Don’t let anyone tell you the Council didn’t change much

By Robert Blair Kaiser, TIME magazine’s man at the Council, October 11, 2012 EXTRACT

The top cardinal in Rome, Alfredo Ottaviani, the pro-prefect of the Holy Office of the Inquisition, could not conceive of any of the changes that the word aggiornamento implied, and I soon found out from theologians like Yves Congar, Jean Daniélou, Karl Rahner, and Edward Schillebeeckx (all of whom had been silenced before Vatican II for their ‘radical thinking’) that Ottaviani was doing almost everything he could to put roadblocks in the way of Council’s major change-projects. And why wouldn’t he? His coat of arms said it all: Semper Idem. Always the same. (http://www.thetablet.co.uk/other/kaiser-vatican-ii-lecture)

 

At the end of Vatican II, the Church opened to a trend of giving in to worldliness, the results of which were the desacralization, democratization, socialization and banalization of the Church, described by Cardinal Ottaviani as “an enormous deviation from the Catholic doctrine“.

(Excerpt from Vatican II About Face, Dr. Fr. Luigi Villa, 2011, http://chiesaviva.com/vaticano%20II%20dietro%20front%20ing.pdf, Introduction)

 

Cardinal Ottaviani on Dignitatis Humanae:

Cardinal Ottaviani made the Council officials note that the Church had always admitted that no one could be forced to profess a certain faith; but that no true right could be claimed by whomever is at odds with the rights of God; that a real and authentic right to religious freedom objectively belongs to only those belonging to the true faith showing that it is extremely dangerous to allow the right of promoting any religion one wishes.

(Excerpt from Vatican II About Face, Dr. Fr. Luigi Villa, 2011, http://chiesaviva.com/vaticano%20II%20dietro%20front%20ing.pdf, page 154)

 

Cardinal Ottaviani, in fact, reminded that no one could be forced to profess the true religion, but that no man could have a right to religious freedom that was in conflict with the rights of God, and that it was dangerous, then, to affirm the legitimacy of the right of evangelization of other religions.

(Excerpt from Vatican II About Face, Dr. Fr. Luigi Villa, 2011, http://chiesaviva.com/vaticano%20II%20dietro%20front%20ing.pdf, page 145)

 

After the Council, the faith of the faithful was so shaken that Cardinal Ottaviani asked all the Bishops of the world and the Superior Generals of the Orders and the Congregations, to respond to the inquiry on the danger for the “fundamental truths” of our Faith.

(Excerpt from Vatican II About Face, Dr. Fr. Luigi Villa, 2011, http://chiesaviva.com/vaticano%20II%20dietro%20front%20ing.pdf, page 194)

 

 

On 25 September 1969,
Ottaviani and Cardinal Antonio Bacci wrote a letter to Paul VI in support of a study by a group of theologians who under the direction of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre criticized the new Order of Mass (in Latin, Novus Ordo Missae), and the new General Instruction (in Latin, Institutio Generalis), two sections (in not quite definitive form) of the revision of the Roman Missal that was promulgated on 3 April of that year but that actually appeared in full only in 1970. This letter became widely known as theOttaviani Intervention” (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ottaviani_Intervention) and is often appealed to by Traditionalist Catholics as support for their opposition to the revision of the Roman Rite Mass.

Source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfredo_Ottaviani

 

 

RELATED FILES

THE THIRD SECRET OF FATIMA AND THE CONSECRATION OF RUSSIA

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/THE_THIRD_SECRET_OF_FATIMA_AND_THE_CONSECRATION_OF_RUSSIA.doc

 

DECLARATION ON MASONIC ASSOCIATIONS
CDF NOVEMBER 26, 1983

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/DECLARATION_ON_MASONIC_ASSOCIATIONS.doc

FREEMASONRY

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/FREEMASONRY.doc

 

NOVUS ORDO MASS A MOST TRAGIC ALTERNATIVE-CARDINAL OTTAVIANI

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NOVUS_ORDO_MASS_A_MOST_TRAGIC_ALTERNATIVE-CARDINAL_OTTAVIANI.doc

CRITICIZING VATICAN COUNCIL II-IS IT HERESY?

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/CRITICIZING_VATICAN_COUNCIL_II-IS_IT_HERESY.doc

WHO IS FR LUIGI VILLA?-DR FRANCO ADESSA

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/WHO_IS_FR_LUIGI_VILLA-DR_FRANCO_ADESSA.doc

FR LUIGI VILLA-A TWENTIETH CENTURY PROPHET

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/FR_LUIGI_VILLA-A_TWENTIETH_CENTURY_PROPHET.doc

WHY WAS THE BEATIFICATION CAUSE OF POPE PAUL VI SUSPENDED?-FR LUIGI VILLA

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/WHY_WAS_THE_BEATIFICATION_CAUSE_OF_POPE_PAUL_VI_SUSPENDED-FR_LUIGI_VILLA.doc

VATICAN II ABOUT FACE-FR. LUIGI VILLA

http://ephesians-511.net/docs/VATICAN_II_ABOUT_FACE-FR_LUIGI_VILLA.doc

Advertisements


Categories: Uncategorized

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

fergymisquitta

The greatest WordPress.com site in all the land!

ephesians-511.net Testimonies

EPHESIANS-511.NET- A Roman Catholic Ministry Exposing Errors in the Indian Church Michael Prabhu, METAMORPHOSE, #12,Dawn Apartments, 22,Leith Castle South Street, Chennai – 600 028, Tamilnadu, India. Phone: +91 (44) 24611606 E-mail: michaelprabhu@vsnl.net, http://www.ephesians-511.net

EPHESIANS-511.NET- A Roman Catholic Ministry Exposing Errors in the Indian Church

Michael Prabhu, METAMORPHOSE, #12,Dawn Apartments, 22,Leith Castle South Street, Chennai - 600 028, Tamilnadu, India. Phone: +91 (44) 24611606 E-mail: michaelprabhu@vsnl.net, http://www.ephesians-511.net

%d bloggers like this: