MARCH 2015
The New Community Bible
Cardinal Oswald Gracias still in denial of responsibility for its errors
This report can be viewed as a follow-up to
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 20-HALF-TRUTHS FROM CARDINAL OSWALD GRACIAS
28 JUNE 2013
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_20-HALF-TRUTHS_FROM_CARDINAL_OSWALD_GRACIAS.doc
The 2013 NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 20 report was necessitated by the dishonest response of Cardinal Oswald Gracias to one Mr. Prakash Lasrado against letters written by the latter after he read my reports on the NCB.
Prakash Lasrado has once again written to the Cardinal and he has made available to all the Cardinal’s reply to him and his own responses to the Cardinal (Lasrado has this very irritating habit of not confining all his thoughts to one letter but writing several letters minutes apart from one another as he realises that he had forgotten one thing or the other).
From: Prakash Lasrado
prakash.lasrado@gmail.com
To: michaelprabhu@vsnl.net, Agnelo Gracias agnelorg@gmail.com
CC: Around 60 others
Subject: Is Oswald Gracias a liar?
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 09:15:33 +0530
Hindu calls Gracias a liar
http://www.narayanmurti.com/3_53_oswald_gracias.php*
My opinion
If the allegations are true and if the Cardinal does not know what is happening in his diocese, it is better he steps down.
If I were a bishop, I would rule with an IRON HAND and COMPASSIONATE HEART on theological matters.
I would swing into action if there are complaints of heresy. *See page 4 of the present report.
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:08:08 +0530 (all emphases his)
If Cardinal Gracias is suffering from cancer, it is better he steps down.
How can a cardinal not be aware of what is in the NCB and what is not?
If one looks at the New Jerusalem Bible, the imprimatur is by Cardinal Basil Hume.
The New Jerusalem Bible is meant for scripture scholars http://www.catholic.org/bible/
Why did Cardinal Gracias escape from his responsibility of providing imprimatur for the NCB Bible?
Is it because he knew there would be trouble brewing for him and wanted other bishops to be scapegoats instead?
Are Western clergy superior to Indian clergy? In my opinion yes.
Prakash Lasrado
To: michaelprabhu@vsnl.net, Cardinal Oswald Gracious
diocesebombay@gmail.com
CC: Around 60 others
Subject: Cardinal Gracias’ reply on the NCB Bible
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 15:47:10 +0530
Rev. Cardinal Gracias,
Thank you for your honest reply below.
However if I were a bishop I would have gone through the text before releasing it to the public.
I would not have the time to scrutinize every “nut and bolt” but I would definitely have a general overview before releasing a theological document to the public.
Ignorance is no bliss nowadays.
Are you aware that the late Cardinal Basil Hume gave the imprimatur to the Good News Bible as well as the New Jerusalem Bible? Why do you shirk responsibility considering that you are a theologian who is considered a peritus?
Prakash Lasrado
March 23, 2015
Dear Mr. Lasrado,
I have with me your email of March 21, 2015. I generally do not respond to emails that have been copied to many people. However, since you have been writing for the Church, I thought I would write to you to explain the matter.
It is certainly true that at the Press Conference* when I was asked if verses from the Vedas and Upanishads were in the Bible, I did say I was not aware. I had released the Community Bible but I had not read it. So I was not aware of the content of the footnotes. It is wrongly presumed that the project was of the Bombay Catholic Church. Nor was it of the CBCI or CCBI. It was by the Society of St. Paul’s who had got some theologians to work on it. I don’t think any from Mumbai were involved. I had neither given the Nihil Obstat nor the Imprimatur. Nor was I aware of this project until the Superior of the Society of St. Paul’s came to invite me to release the book. I gladly did so presuming everything was all right.
When I received some reports of dissatisfaction with the Bible, as Archbishop of Bombay I put the reprinting on hold and asked the CBCI to study the text which was done.
I was aware that he (P. Deivamuthu, see page 4, and not the Shankaracharya as I wrongly said earlier and as pointed out by Lasrado to me) said later I was lying, but I did not want to get into a discussion with him. I consulted some people in the media and they advised me to ignore it. This Bible has now been approved by the CBCI and has been reprinted after some changes were made. Since I had held up the printing, I gave the permission for the reprinting.
With kind regards and best wishes,
Yours sincerely in Christ,
Oswald Cardinal Gracias
Archbishop of Bombay
(President – CBCI, President – FABC)
*Cardinal Oswald Gracias is referring to the press conference held on June 12, 2009, at 3.30 p.m. at the Shanmukhananda Hall, King Circle, Mumbai, addressed by him and the Kanchi Shankaracharya, subsequent to an Inter-Religious Dialogue held at the same venue. See page 4 of the present report.
In response to a question put to him, “In the Indian Community Bible released by Mumbai Catholic Church, you have included hundreds of verses from Vedas and Upanishads. Does this not amount to stealing the intellectual property of Hindus?” he said, “I am not aware of this“.
See
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 11-VATICAN HELD RESPONSIBLE, BRAHMIN LEADERS DEMAND ITS WITHDRAWAL JUNE 25, 2009/DECEMBER 2009
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:14:30 +0530
To: michaelprabhu@vsnl.net, Cardinal Oswald Gracious diocesebombay@gmail.com
CC: Around 60 others
Rev. Cardinal Gracias,
Anyway I consider the Indian version of the NCB Bible with Hindu texts a waste of time and money.
Changes that were made prior to reprinting show that good work was not done in the first place.
There should have been a separate book comparing Hinduism and Christianity.
Prakash Lasrado
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:36:51 +0530
To: michaelprabhu@vsnl.net, Cardinal Oswald Gracious diocesebombay@gmail.com
CC: Around 60 others
Rev. Cardinal Gracias,
You mention in your letter that you do not think anyone from Mumbai was involved with the NCB project
Did Bishop Percival Fernandez of Mumbai provide the imprimatur for the 2008 edition of the NCB?
Was this same 2008 edition released by you in public at Mumbai?
Were there subsequent changes in the 2011 edition? If yes then is Bishop Percival fit to give an imprimatur?
Were the bishops who gave the imprimatur to 2011 edition other than Bishop Percival? If yes then is Bishop Percival fit to give an imprimatur?
Prakash Lasrado
Let us analyse the Cardinal’s letter to Mr. Lasrado.
“I had released the Community Bible but I had not read it. So I was not aware of the content of the footnotes. It is wrongly presumed that the project was of the Bombay Catholic Church. Nor was it of the CBCI or CCBI. It was by the Society of St. Paul’s who had got some theologians to work on it. I don’t think any from Mumbai were involved. I had neither given the Nihil Obstat nor the Imprimatur. Nor was I aware of this project until the Superior of the Society of St. Paul’s came to invite me to release the book. I gladly did so presuming everything was all right.“
An extract from
The Examiner, The Archdiocesan weekly of Bombay,
July 05, 2008:
Cardinal Oswald Gracias released the New Community Bible on June 28, 2008 during a concelebrated Mass on the occasion of the commencement of the Pauline Year. Cardinal Gracias in his homily urged the people to familiarize themselves with this Bible which is a revised edition of the popular Christian Community Bible during this year which has been declared as the year of the ‘Word of God’ in the Archdiocese of Bombay.
He congratulated the Paulist brothers and the daughters of St. Paul for their efforts in making this revised edition available to the people in India.
The Nihil Obstat was given by Most Rev. Thomas Dabre, Bishop of Vasai, and Chairman, Doctrinal Commission, CBCI.
The Imprimatur was from Most Rev. Percival Fernandez, Auxiliary Bishop of Bombay, Former Secretary-General, CBCI.
Cardinal Oswald Gracias releases the “Bible”, foists its heretical and pluralistic commentaries and syncretistic line-drawings on the faithful by recommending it to them, heartily congratulates the Society of St. Paul on its publication and then has the temerity to inform us through Mr. Lasrado that he did not examine its contents!
Those same “foot-notes” a.k.a. commentaries, along with the sketches, is what the 2008 NCB was all about!!
The text was simply a reproduction of that of the Christian Community Bible.
But the Cardinal did not even peek inside the book. That’s what he also said to the Hindu delegation.
In displaying his ignorance of the contents of the Christian Sacred Book, he was publicly humiliated, and made a laughing stock of not just himself but of the entire Indian Church as well as the Universal Church by the Brahmin pontiff, Shankaracharya, Hinduism’s leading religious figure.
A prince of the Church and a confidante of the Pope who relies on his integrity and wisdom and discernment does something as unbelievably stupid as releasing a book without first looking in-between its covers?
Why not? In January 2012, he strongly recommended a book authored by a priest Kenneth Pereira SDB, which was “marked by religious plurality” and supplemented with “some of the ideas of
Carl Rogers“, an existential humanist ranked as New Ager no. 4 in the 2003 Vatican Document on the New Age!!!!! See
THE SALESIANS, OSWALD CARDINAL GRACIAS AND NEW AGE PSYCHOLOGIST CARL ROGERS
MARCH 2012/APRIL 2013
The NCB had the Imprimatur of a Bombay subordinate of his, Bishop Percival Fernandez. Did the Cardinal discipline him for his failure to see that an error-free Bible was printed and sold when giving the Imprimatur?
After all, the NCB was pulled following the crusade launched by this ministry, and released as a Revised Edition after expurgating around 90% of the contents that we had found to be offensive.
The NCB had the Nihil Obstat of the Chairman of the CBCI’s Doctrinal Commission, Bishop Thomas Dabre.
Was he held accountable for his dereliction of duty in safeguarding Catholics from error?
The Cardinal simply shrugs off any personal responsibility in the matter, and exonerates all the other Bishops of the CBCI/CCBI. He does not even hold the thirty commentators guilty of heresy or promoting modernism and religious pluralism in the guise of contextualizing theology for the Indian situation. It was St. Pauls “who had got some theologians to work on it“. He was not even “aware of this project until the Superior of the Society of St. Paul’s came to invite” him to release the book. Any reader who has served in a senior capacity in the corporate sector would know what would have been the fate of the top man who said such pitiable things in his defense after a debacle that caused their company to lose face… or money. In this case too, it was both. St Pauls lost money and face most when they were compelled to bring out a Revised Edition in 2011.
And this time, to be safe, there was no Nihil Obstat, and FIVE bishops came together to give the Imprimatur!
The Cardinal informs Mr. Lasrado, “This Bible has now been approved by the CBCI and has been reprinted after some changes were made“. If the Revised Edition “has now been approved by the CBCI“, there is absolutely no indication of that in its credits, and so the Cardinal is once again lying. The only differences between the 2008 and 2011 editions are those mentioned regarding the Nihil Obstat and the Imprimatur. So, logically, if the Revised Edition is CBCI-approved, then so also was the 2008 edition!
All said and done, this ministry totally rejects the Revised Edition too. It is not error-free. See the list of files (and links) chronicling all developments from the NCB release till date, at the end of this report.
The Cardinal ends his letter with “Since I had held up the printing, I gave the permission for the reprinting“. Somehow, I find it difficult to believe that. Because we took the NCB matter to Rome and the Cardinal was faced with no alternative but to withdraw it. And because I had personally written to every Bishop in India, some of them multiple times, but none of them could assure me of anything more than that they would examine the matter.
Additionally, since our crusade was also widely reported in the print and Internet media, what prevented Cardinal Oswald Gracias from writing to me about his decision to withdraw and reprint the NCB after expunging some of its comments (including two whole pages!)?
Instead, the entire process was conducted surreptitiously with St Pauls even issuing a denial in the secular as well as Catholic media that a revised edition was forthcoming. Many Catholics have little or no faith left in the integrity of their leaders, and in the NCB case they behaved true to form.
The following letters are selected for reproduction here because they are from Cardinal Oswald Gracias or from Bishops who mention him in the context of the NCB:
From:
Oswald Gracias
To:
prabhu
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 3:13 PM
Subject: Re: PROBLEMS WITH THE NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE
Dear Mr. Prabhu,
I am now in Bangalore where I have seen you email. Please do let me have your comments on the NCB bible. I will have the comments studied. Thank you for your interest. With kind regards,
Cardinal Gracias [Archbishop of Bombay]
From:
prabhu
To:
abpossie@gmail.com
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 9:23 PM
Subject: Re: PROBLEMS WITH THE NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE – WITH NCB REPORT
Dear Cardinal Gracias,
I thank you very much for your kind and very prompt response. It is encouraging for our team as some Bishops and Archbishops whom we contacted by telephone and email were quite indifferent and did not even want to see our study.
I am attaching here the report on the NCB for your study, as requested by you.
I am confident that you will share our concern about the sections of the commentaries that we have only briefly analysed.
Could you please respond after you receive/read the report, in acknowledgement? In Jesus’ Name. Michael
From:
D. M. Noronha
To:
prabhu
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2008 12:21 PM
Subject: From Bishop Agnelo Gracias
Dear Michael,
Yes, I have received the attachment you sent. I have spoken to Cardinal Oswald Gracias. A two member Commission has been appointed by him to study the New Community Bible. I am sure he will reply to you. With every good wish, I remain
In Christo,
Agnelo Gracias
Auxiliary Bishop of Bombay
From:
valerian d’souza
To:
‘prabhu’ ; punedioc@vsnl.com
Cc:
response2communitybible@gmail.com ; cyriljohn@vsnl.net ; nco@vsnl.net;
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:32 PM Subject: RE: REMINDER. LETTER No. 4: NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE
Dear Michael,
Apparently you have not received my reply to you dated 19th July sent from punedioc@vsnl.com. I shall ask my PA to send it to you again.
From the very beginning I had asked you to send me the objections raised. But did not receive anything from you except reminders.
A few hours ago I returned from the meeting of the Western Region Bishops’ Council where the matter of the New Community Bible was discussed. Naturally the bishops are worried when people are disturbed. Cardinal Oswald Gracias will collate the objections and have a thorough study made. Articles and explanations will have to be given.
You could have made your points without insinuations and judgements.
Wishing you God’s abundant blessings,
+Valerian [Valerian D’Souza, Bishop of Poona, Chairman, Clergy and Religious Commission, CBCI]
From:
Oswald Gracias
To:
prabhu
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 7:31 PM
Subject: Re: THE NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE TEACHES THAT THE ANGEL GABRIEL DID NOT APPEAR TO MARY
Dear Mr. Prabhu,
We are having the commentary studied. You have mentioned Bishop Agnelo’s report. I have also seen that.
I am conscious of our serious responsibility to ensure that the correct doctrine is taught. God bless.
Cardinal Gracias
[Archbishop of Bombay]
See page 2 of this report (the article and site referred to by Lasrado).
http://www.narayanmurti.com/3_53_oswald_gracias.php
Oswald Gracias is a Blatant Liar
The new Pope Francis has selected Mumbai Archbishop Cardinal Oswald Gracias as one of the eight members of a panel that will help advise him.
Mumbai Archbishop Cardinal Oswald Gracias is a blatant liar. I am surprised how such a great liar is accommodated by the new Pope.
I attended the Press Conference, held on 12th June 2009 at 4.00 p.m. at the Shanmukhananda Hall, King Circle, Mumbai, addressed by Kanchi Shankaracharya Swamiji and the Archbishop of Mumbai, Cardinal Oswald Gracias, subsequent to the Inter-Faith Dialogue held at the same venue.
After their Press Briefing, when question time arrived, I put a question to Archbishop Cardinal Oswald Gracias: “In the New Community Bible released by Mumbai Catholic Church, you have included hundreds of verses from Vedas and Upanishads. Does this not amount to steeling the intellectual property of Hindus?”
The answer given by the Cardinal was “I am not aware of this”.
In fact, the Mumbai Catholic Church had worked on this project for 18 years. It (The New Community Bible) was released by the Archbishop of Mumbai himself, Cardinal Oswald Gracias in July 2008. The Bible included hundreds of verses from Vedas, Upanishads and Bhagwat Gita. The event was widely covered by the press.
After working on the project for 18 long years and having himself released the Book – The New Community Bible – the Cardinal had the audacity to say that he was not aware of it, in the presence of about 30 journalists and photographers and also Kanchi Shankaracharya Swamiji.
We take politicians to task for their lies and misdeeds. If it is Hindu religious heads, the media will pounce on them. But the lies and misdeeds of Christian religious heads just go unnoticed. The media refuses to take note of them. Are these Christian religious heads any better than an ordinary politician?
And such a great liar is appointed by the Pope to advise him. One wonders, is the entire panel consisting of such characters?
P. Deivamuthu
Editor, Hindu Voice
210 Abhinav, 2nd floor
Teen Dongri, Yashwant Nagar
Goregaon West, Mumbai 400062.
Also at http://www.haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?PageID=8801
Other reports in the Cardinal Oswald Gracias series:
CARDINAL OSWALD GRACIAS ENDORSES YOGA FOR CATHOLICS
25 FEBRUARY/9 APRIL 2013
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/CARDINAL_OSWALD_GRACIAS_ENDORSES_YOGA_FOR_CATHOLICS.doc
PAPAL CANDIDATE OSWALD CARDINAL GRACIAS ENDORSES YOGA
2
MARCH/9 APRIL 2013
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/PAPAL_CANDIDATE_OSWALD_CARDINAL_GRACIAS_ENDORSES_YOGA.doc
SHOULD OSWALD CARDINAL GRACIAS HAVE RESIGNED AS CARDINAL OBRIEN DID
14 MARCH 2013
HINDU RELIGIOUS MARK ON THE FOREHEAD 16-CARDINAL OSWALD GRACIAS WEARS
APRIL 2013
The New Community Bible series:
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 01-A CRITIQUE JULY 14, 2008
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_01-A_CRITIQUE.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 02-THE PAPAL SEMINARY, PUNE, INDIAN THEOLOGIANS, AND THE CATHOLIC ASHRAMS 18 SEPTEMBER 2008/SEPTEMBER 2009/APRIL 2012
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 03-A FRENCH THEOLOGIAN DENOUNCES ERRORS IN THE COMMENTARIES FEBRUARY 24, 2009
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 04-THE ONGOING ROBBERY OF FAITH FEBRUARY 24, 2009
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_04-THE_ONGOING_ROBBERY_OF_FAITH.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 05-THE ANGEL GABRIEL DID NOT APPEAR TO THE VIRGIN MARY MARCH 15, 2009
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 06-PRESS REPORTS AND READERS’ CRITICISMS MARCH 22, 2009/DECEMBER 2009
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_06-PRESS_REPORTS_AND_READERS_CRITICISMS.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 06A-EPHESIANS-511.NET PRESS REPORTS
MARCH 2015
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_06A-EPHESIANS-511.NET_PRESS_REPORTS.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 07-UNPUBLISHED LETTERS AGAINST ITS ERRONEOUS COMMENTARIES-THE EXAMINER MAY 2009
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 08-LETTERS CALLING FOR ITS WITHDRAWAL 31 DECEMBER 2008/DECEMBER 2009
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_08-LETTERS_CALLING_FOR_ITS_WITHDRAWAL.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 09-LETTER TO THE CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH APRIL-MAY 2009
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 10-CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE SECULAR MEDIA, AND WITH PRIEST-CRITICS OF OUR CRUSADE AGAINST ITS ERRORS MAY 2009
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 11-VATICAN HELD RESPONSIBLE, BRAHMIN LEADERS DEMAND ITS WITHDRAWAL JUNE 25, 2009/DECEMBER 2009
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 12-LETTERS TO ROME JUNE 2009/AUGUST 2013
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_12-LETTERS_TO_ROME.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 13-RESPONSES FROM THE BISHOPS AND THEIR EXECUTIVE COMMISSIONS AUGUST 2009
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 14-UKRAINIAN ORTHODOX GREEK CATHOLIC BISHOPS CALL IT A NEW AGE BIBLE, “EXCOMMUNICATE” INDIAN BISHOPS
MARCH 2010/APRIL 2012
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 15-DEMAND FOR ORDINATION OF WOMEN PRIESTS-FR SUBHASH ANAND AND OTHERS
APRIL 2010/JULY 2010/APRIL 2012/17 MARCH/10 APRIL 2013
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 16-CRITIQUE BY DERRICK D’COSTA
JULY 2010
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_16-CRITIQUE_BY_DERRICK_DCOSTA.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 17-EXTOLLED BY CAMALDOLI BENEDICTINE OBLATE 1/5/10 MAY 2013
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_17-EXTOLLED_BY_CAMALDOLI_BENEDICTINE_OBLATE.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 18-REVISED EDITION COMING, ST PAULS IN DENIAL JULY 2010/DECEMBER 2011
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_18-REVISED_EDITION_COMING_ST_PAULS_IN_DENIAL.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 19-REVISED EDITION PUBLISHED A YEAR AFTER DENIAL JULY 2010/DECEMBER 2011
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 20-HALF-TRUTHS FROM CARDINAL OSWALD GRACIAS 28 JUNE 2013
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_20-HALF-TRUTHS_FROM_CARDINAL_OSWALD_GRACIAS.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 21-INDIAN CHURCH’S SYNCRETIZED BIBLE EXPORTED 7 MARCH/6/9/24/30 MAY/5 JUNE, 2013
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_21-INDIAN_CHURCHS_SYNCRETIZED_BIBLE_EXPORTED.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 22-BISHOP AGNELO GRACIAS DEFENDS IT YET IT IS PULLED FOR REVISION FEBRUARY 2015
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 23-EDDIE RUSSELL CALLS IT A HINDUISED HERETICAL BIBLE FEBRUARY 2015
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 24-WHAT WERE THE REVISIONS MADE IN IT?
FEBRUARY 2015
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE_24-WHAT_WERE_THE_REVISIONS_MADE_IN_IT.doc
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 25-REVISED EDITION NOT RECOMMENDED FOR CATHOLICS FEBRUARY 2015
NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE 26-RESPONSES TO REVISED EDITION NOT RECOMMENDED FOR CATHOLICS
MARCH 2015
HINDU RELIGIOUS MARK ON THE FOREHEAD 22-THE NEW COMMUNITY BIBLE
FEBRUARY 2015
http://ephesians-511.net/docs/HINDU_RELIGIOUS_MARK_ON_THE_FOREHEAD_22-THE_NEW_COMMUNITY_BIBLE.doc
Categories: Hinduisation of the Catholic Church in India
Related Articles
-
FRANCIS WON’T ABOLISH ‘HINDU RITE’ EUCHARIST
-
THE SPIRITUAL DECEPTIONS OF THE NEW AGE MOVEMENT AND WHAT THE CATHOLIC CHURCH HAS PRONOUNCED ON THEM
-
Pope Francis’ New Age Holistic Health Conference on “Exploring the Mind, Body and Soul”
-
“Compendium of New Age Deceptions and Corresponding Church Teachings: Medications and Meditations in the New Age” Book Author – Michael Prabhu
EPHESIANS-511.NET- A Roman Catholic Ministry Exposing Errors in the Indian Church 
Leave a Reply